Laminate Nonconformance Management System

ABSTRACT

A method, apparatus, and system for managing nonconformances in laminates. A nonconformance management system comprises a sensor system and an analyzer in a computer system. The sensor that records layup information about the layup of layers on a workpiece platform and records inspection information about the laminate located on an inspection platform, wherein the laminate is formed from curing the workpiece. The analyzer in the computer system identifies a laminate nonconformance in the laminate using the inspection information, generates nonconformance information about the laminate nonconformance, and displays the nonconformance information about the laminate nonconformance on the laminate using a display system for an augmented reality display.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Field

The present disclosure relates generally to manufacturing parts and, inparticular, to fabricating laminates for parts. Still more particularly,the present disclosure relates to a method, apparatus, and system formanaging nonconformances in laminates.

2. Background

A laminate is a structure that is manufactured in multiple layers. Alaminate may have desirable characteristics such as increased strength,stability, sound insulation, appearance, or other characteristics fromthe selection of the layers used to form the laminate.

Stacks of raw materials may be laid up in layers. This layup of layerscan be laid up on a first metal caul plate. The layup of layers can be,for example, a first polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) layer, an embossing resin(ER) layer, and a second polyvinyl fluoride layer. The embossing resinlayer is located between the first polyvinyl fluoride layer and thesecond polyvinyl fluoride layer. These layers form a workpiece orsandwich.

Multiple workpieces can be laid up from multiple layers. The layup istypically performed at a build station. The first workpiece is laid upon the caul plate on a platform at the build station. Subsequentworkpieces can be formed from laying up layers to form additionworkpieces on top of the first workpiece. These different workpieces canbe separated from each other by release sheets or types of layers thatprovide an ability to keep separate laminates formed from curing theseworkpieces. Additionally, texture layers can be included to form atexture in the laminates.

When all of the workpieces are laid up, a second metal caul plate isplaced on top of the last workpiece to form a tray. The tray is placedin a press for processing of the workpieces. The press applies pressureto the layers for the workpieces. Further, the temperature can be raisedto heat the layers in the tray as pressure is applied by the press aspart of the curing process.

After the workpieces have been cured to form laminates, the tray isreturned to the build station for further processing. At the buildstation, the laminates are inspected by human operators. The inspectionis performed to determine whether a nonconformance is present thatprevents use of the laminate in manufacturing parts. Laminates that passinspection are prepared and routed for further processing to createparts from the laminates.

Currently, this process results in more scrap from laminates that havenonconformances than desired. Detecting these nonconformances fromvisual inspections can be tedious error prone, and relies on the skillof the operator. It would be desirable to have a method and apparatusthat take into account at least some of the issues discussed above, aswell as other possible issues. For example, it would be desirable tohave a method and apparatus that overcome a technical problem withaccurately identifying nonconformances in laminates.

SUMMARY

An embodiment of the present disclosure provides a nonconformancemanagement system comprising a workpiece platform, an inspectionplatform, a sensor system, and an analyzer in a computer system. Theworkpiece platform supports a layup of layers laid up on the workpieceplatform to form a workpiece. The inspection platform supports alaminate formed from the workpiece. The sensor system records layupinformation about the layup of layers on the workpiece platform andrecords inspection information about the laminate located on aninspection platform, wherein the laminate is formed from curing theworkpiece. The analyzer in the computer system identifies a laminatenonconformance in the laminate using the inspection information,generates nonconformance information about the laminate nonconformance,and displays the nonconformance information about the laminatenonconformance on the laminate using a display system for an augmentedreality display.

Another embodiment of the present disclosure provides a nonconformancemanagement system comprising a sensor system and an analyzer in acomputer system. The sensor system records layup information about alayup of layers that form a workpiece. The analyzer in the computersystem predicts a laminate nonconformance in a laminate using the layupinformation, wherein the laminate is formed from curing the layup oflayers. The analyzer generates change information indicating a change inthe layup of layers that reduces a probability that the laminatenonconformance will be present when the layup of layers is cured to formthe laminate. The analyzer displays the change information indicatingthe change in the layup of layers on a live view of the layup of layersusing a display system for an augmented reality display.

Still another embodiment of the present disclosure provides anonconformance management system comprising a sensor system and ananalyzer in a computer system. The sensor system detects a laminate onan inspection platform. The laminate is formed from curing a workpiececomprising a layup of layers. The analyzer in the computer systemdetermines whether a laminate nonconformance is present in the laminateusing layup information recorded by the sensor system, generatesnonconformance information about the laminate nonconformance when thelaminate nonconformance is detected, and displays the nonconformanceinformation about the laminate nonconformance on the laminate using adisplay system for an augmented reality display. The analyzer determineswhether the laminate nonconformance is present in the laminate using anartificial intelligence system trained using prior layup informationrecorded for prior workpieces, prior inspection information about priorlaminates formed from the prior workpieces, and prior user input aboutprior nonconformances in the prior laminates.

Yet another embodiment of the present disclosure provides a method formanaging manufacturing of a laminate. A sensor system records layupinformation about a layup of layers on a workpiece platform, wherein thelayup of layers forms a workpiece. The sensor system records inspectioninformation about the laminate on an inspection platform, wherein thelaminate is formed from curing the workpiece. A user input describing alaminate nonconformance in the laminate on the inspection platform isreceived by a user input system. A computer system trains an artificialintelligence system using the layup information, the inspectioninformation, and the user input describing the laminate nonconformance.

The features and functions can be achieved independently in variousembodiments of the present disclosure or may be combined in yet otherembodiments in which further details can be seen with reference to thefollowing description and drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The novel features believed characteristic of the illustrativeembodiments are set forth in the appended claims. The illustrativeembodiments, however, as well as a preferred mode of use, furtherobjectives and features thereof, will best be understood by reference tothe following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment of thepresent disclosure when read in conjunction with the accompanyingdrawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is an illustration of a pictorial representation of a network ofdata processing systems and a build station in which illustrativeembodiments may be implemented;

FIG. 2 is an illustration of a block diagram of a laminate manufacturingenvironment in accordance with an illustrative embodiment;

FIG. 3 is an illustration of a dataflow for predicting a nonconformancein accordance with an illustrative embodiment;

FIG. 4 is an illustration of a dataflow for managing a nonconformance ina laminate in accordance with an illustrative embodiment;

FIG. 5 is an illustration of a dataflow for training an artificialintelligence system to manage laminate nonconformances in laminates inaccordance with an illustrative embodiment;

FIG. 6 is an illustration of an augmented reality display ofnonconformance information on a laminate in accordance with anillustrative embodiment;

FIG. 7 is an illustration of a display of a pattern on a laminate inaccordance with an illustrative embodiment;

FIG. 8 is an illustration of a display of change information for a layerof material in a workpiece in accordance with an illustrativeembodiment;

FIG. 9 is an illustration of a flowchart of a process for managingmanufacturing of a laminate in accordance with an illustrativeembodiment;

FIG. 10 is an illustration of a flowchart of a process for identifyinglaminate nonconformances in laminates in accordance with an illustrativeembodiment;

FIG. 11 is an illustration of a flowchart of a process for predictinglaminate nonconformances in laminates in accordance with an illustrativeembodiment;

FIG. 12 is an illustration of a flowchart of a process for processing alaminate with a laminate nonconformances in accordance with anillustrative embodiment;

FIG. 13 is an illustration of a block diagram of a data processingsystem in accordance with an illustrative embodiment;

FIG. 14 is an illustration of a block diagram of an aircraftmanufacturing and service method in accordance with an illustrativeembodiment;

FIG. 15 is an illustration of a block diagram of an aircraft in which anillustrative embodiment may be implemented; and

FIG. 16 is an illustration of a block diagram of a product managementsystem in accordance with an illustrative embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The illustrative embodiments recognize and take into account one or moredifferent considerations. For example, the illustrative embodimentsrecognize and take into account that analyzing nonconformances inlaminates can affect the manner in which the layup of layers to formworkpieces occur. For example, the illustrative embodiments recognizeand take into account that at least one of a wrinkle in a layer, aforeign object, debris, material handling, a material issue, or otherfactor in laying layers can result in nonconformances in laminates.

As used herein, the phrase “at least one of,” when used with a list ofitems, means different combinations of one or more of the listed itemscan be used, and only one of each item in the list may be needed. Inother words, “at least one of” means any combination of items and numberof items may be used from the list, but not all of the items in the listare required. The item can be a particular object, a thing, or acategory.

For example, without limitation, “at least one of item A, item B, oritem C” may include item A, item A and item B, or item B. This examplealso may include item A, item B, and item C or item B and item C. Ofcourse, any combinations of these items can be present. In someillustrative examples, “at least one of” can be, for example, withoutlimitation, two of item A; one of item B; and ten of item C; four ofitem B and seven of item C; or other suitable combinations.

The illustrative embodiments also recognize and take into account thatthe ability of human operators to consistently detect nonconformances isoften not as great as desired. The illustrative embodiments recognizeand take into account that nonconformances can be difficult to detectbecause of the size of nonconformances. Further, the illustrativeembodiments recognize and take into account that with the repetitivenessand large number of laminates for inspection along with other duties,human operators may not always correctly identify nonconformances inlaminates.

Thus, the illustrative embodiments provide a method, apparatus, andsystem for managing nonconformances in manufacturing laminates. In oneillustrative example, a sensor system records layup information about alayup of layers on a tool on a workpiece platform. The layup of layersforms a workpiece. The sensor system records inspection informationabout a laminate on an inspection platform. The laminate is formed fromcuring the workpiece. A user input system receives a user inputdescribing a nonconformance in the laminate on the inspection platform.A computer system trains an artificial intelligence system using thelayup information, the inspection information, and the user inputdescribing the nonconformance in the laminate.

With reference now to the figures and, in particular, with reference toFIG. 1, an illustration of a pictorial representation of a network ofdata processing systems and a build station is depicted in whichillustrative embodiments may be implemented. Network data processingsystem 100 is a network of computers in which the illustrativeembodiments may be implemented. Network data processing system 100contains network 102, which is the medium used to provide communicationslinks between various devices and computers connected together withinnetwork data processing system 100. Network 102 may include connectionssuch as wire, wireless communication links, or fiber optic cables.

In the depicted example, server computer 104 and client computer 106 areconnected to network 102. In the depicted example, server computer 104provides information, such as boot files, operating system images, andapplications to client computer 106.

Program code located in network data processing system 100 can be storedon a computer-recordable storage medium and downloaded to a dataprocessing system or other device for use. For example, program code canbe stored on a computer-recordable storage medium on server computer 104and downloaded to client computer 106 over network 102 for use on clientcomputer 106.

In the depicted example, network data processing system 100 is theInternet with network 102 representing a worldwide collection ofnetworks and gateways that use the Transmission ControlProtocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) suite of protocols to communicatewith one another. At the heart of the Internet is a backbone ofhigh-speed data communication lines between major nodes or hostcomputers consisting of thousands of commercial, governmental,educational, and other computer systems that route data and messages. Ofcourse, network data processing system 100 also may be implemented usinga number of different types of networks. For example, network 102 can becomprised of at least one of the Internet, an intranet, a local areanetwork (LAN), a metropolitan area network (MAN), or a wide area network(WAN). FIG. 1 is intended as an example, and not as an architecturallimitation for the different illustrative embodiments.

As used herein, “a number of” when used with reference to items, meansone or more items. For example, “a number of different types ofnetworks” is one or more different types of networks. In this depictedexample, client computer 106 is in communication with a sensor systemcomprising camera 108, camera 110, and camera 112 at build station 114.With these components, client computer 106 can record layup information116 about the layup of layers on a tool such as a metal caul plate onplatform 118 in build station 114 to form workpieces. The forming of theworkpieces can be performed by at least one of human operator 120 orhuman operator 122 at build station 114.

Additionally, client computer 106 is also in communication with adisplay system comprising laser projector 124 at build station 114.Laser projector 124 can display information to human operator 120 andhuman operator 122. In this illustrative example, laser projector 124uses one or more lasers that are directed to and scan platform 118 orobjects on platform 118 to display information. This information caninclude text, graphics, video, or other information that is visible toat least one of human operator 120 or human operator 122. This type ofdisplay can provide an augmented reality display to display informationon a live view of the real-world environment such as platform 118 orobjects on platform 118. The display can be such that information isseamlessly woven such that the information is perceived as part ofplatform 118 or objects on platform 118.

During a build operation at build station 114, layers of material arelaid up on platform 118 to form one or more workpieces. During thisbuild operation, human operator 120 can identify nonconformances inlayers being laid up. Nonconformances in the layers can include at leastone of a rip, a tear, a wrinkle, foreign debris, or othernonconformances.

In addition to identifying nonconformances, human operator 120 canindicate whether a particular nonconformance is acceptable or can beresolved. If the nonconformance cannot be resolved, the layer isscrapped.

In this illustrative example, client computer 106 projects a userinterface directly onto a layer on platform 118 to allow human operator120 to designate a precise location of where a nonconformance in a layermay be present. This nonconformance may be one that human operator 120believes will not result in a nonconformance in the laminate. In thisexample, this designation is user input in the form of gestures whichcan be detected by at least one of camera 108, camera 110, or camera112. The user input can be considered part of layup information 116.Layup information 116 can also include a video of the layup process orother information that can be detected by the campers.

Layup information 116 is sent to analyzer 126. Analyzer 126 can uselayup information 116 to train artificial intelligence system 128. Asartificial intelligence system 128 learns potential issues, artificialintelligence system 128 can communicate with client computer 106 tohighlight areas of potential nonconformances directly on the layer laidup on platform 118 using laser projector 124 and allow human operator120 to verify the presence of the nonconformance as well as otherinformation about the nonconformance on the layer. This informationforms additional information that can be used for further training ofartificial intelligence system 128.

After the layers have been laid up to form workpieces, another metalcaul plate can be placed on these workpieces to form a tray. The tray ismoved to a press where pressure and heat are applied to cure theworkpieces to form laminates. These laminates can be returned toplatform 118 in build station 114 for inspection.

In this example, human operator 122 inspects the laminates fornonconformances. Human operator 122 generates user input that indicatesthe location of any nonconformances on the laminates. This information,along with a video or images of inspection from the cameras and othersuitable information, forms inspection information 130. As depicted,inspection information 130 is sent to analyzer 126 running on servercomputer 104.

With inspection information 130 and layup information 116, analyzer 126can use artificial intelligence system 128 to correlate nonconformancesidentified in a workpiece with a nonconformance in the laminate formedfrom curing the workpiece. In this manner, a prediction of when anonconformance may occur can be made based on nonconformances identifiedin laying up layers for the workpiece. Further, verifications ofpredictions of nonconformances can be used in further training ofartificial intelligence system 128 by analyzer 126.

As depicted, computer vision and gesture recognition processes can beimplemented in at least one of analyzer 126 or artificial intelligencesystem 128. The processes can enable human operator 122 to generate userinput detected by at least one of camera 108, camera 110, and camera112. The user input specifies where on the laminate nonconformancesexist and classifies the types of nonconformances. These processes canalso receive user input about the disposition and state of the laminate.The state can be, for example, one of useable, rework, or scrap.

Further, analyzer 126 can also project patterns of laminate cutoutsdirectly onto a laminate on platform 118 in build station 114 usinglaser projector 124. The patterns are potential patterns for cutting outparts from the laminate. In the illustrative example, analyzer 126projects one pattern at a time onto the laminate.

Additionally, analyzer 126 can also project graphical indicators fornonconformances on the laminate using laser projector 124. For example,graphical indicators can be an outline of nonconformances, boundariesencompassing the nonconformances, or other types of graphical indicatorsthat bring attention to the location of nonconformances on thelaminates. This display of information is an augmented reality displaythat allows human operator 122 to visualize the pattern with respect toone or more nonconformances in a laminate.

Additionally, human operator 122 can also generate user input toreposition a pattern projected onto the laminate. Further, humanoperator 122 can view multiple patterns for the same or different partsto determine what pattern or patterns may be the most desirable patternbased on the nonconformance or nonconformances on the laminate. With thevisualization of this information in the augmented reality display,human operator 120 can accept, reject, and reorient patterns andvisualize these patterns in a laminate with the locations ofnonconformances displayed on the laminate.

Further, user input can be used with inspection information 130 to trainartificial intelligence system 128 using machine learning techniques.The training can enable artificial intelligence system 128 to recognizepost-cure nonconformances. Inspection information 130 can include, forexample, nonconformance classification, nonconformance locationinformation, laminate part type, or pattern selection positioning.

With reference next to FIG. 2, an illustration of a block diagram of alaminate manufacturing environment is depicted in accordance with anillustrative embodiment. In this illustrative example, laminatemanufacturing environment 200 is an environment in which laminates 202are manufactured.

For example, layup of layers 204 is laid up to form workpiece 206.Workpiece 206 is present when all of layers of materials 228 forlaminate 208 are laid up on workpiece platform 230. Workpiece 206 iscured to form laminate 208 in laminates 202. The curing can occur usingat least one of pressure or heat applied to workpiece 206.

In this illustrative example, layers of materials 228 in layup of layers204 comprises first outer layer 248, core layer 250, and second outerlayer 252. Core layer 250 is located between first outer layer 248 andsecond outer layer 252.

In one illustrative example, first outer layer 248 is selected from oneof a thermoplastic layer and a polyvinyl fluoride layer. Second outerlayer 252 is selected from one of the thermoplastic layer and thepolyvinyl fluoride layer. Core layer 250 is selected from one of a resinlayer, a carbon layer, and a honeycomb layer. Additionally, the layersin layup of layers 204 can also include at least one of a release sheet,a texture blanket, or a coating layer. Layers such as the release sheetand the texture blanket do not become part of laminate 208 but are usedin forming laminate 208. In this example, a coating layer does becomepart of laminate 208. The coating layer can have a design or applique.

Identifier 254 can be used to correlate workpiece 206 with laminate 208.As depicted, identifier 254 is associated with workpiece 206. Identifier254 is present in laminate 208 and identifies laminate 208 as beingformed from workpiece 206. In this illustrative example, identifier 254can be selected from at least one of a barcode, a radio frequencyidentifier, text, a visual code, or some other visual ormachine-readable identifier.

As depicted, nonconformance management system 210 can be used to managethe allocation of laminates 202. In this illustrative example,nonconformance management system 210 includes a number of differentcomponents. As depicted in this example, nonconformance managementsystem 210 includes sensor system 212, display system 214, input system216, and analyzer 218. As depicted, analyzer 218 is located in computersystem 220 in nonconformance management system 210.

As depicted, sensor system 212 is a physical hardware system thatoperates to detect operations, steps, and other actions performed for atleast one of laying up layers of materials for layup of layers 204 thatform workpiece 206 when layup of layers 204 is complete. Sensor system212 can also detect laminate 208 on inspection platform 232. Laminate208 results from curing workpiece 206.

In this illustrative example, sensor system 212 includes a number ofdifferent components. For example, sensor system 212 can include atleast one of a camera, a visible light camera, an infrared camera, alaser scanner, or other suitable types of sensors.

Display system 214 is a physical hardware system and includes one ormore display devices on which graphical user interface 222 can bedisplayed. The display devices may include at least one of a projector,a laser projector, smart glasses, a smart contact lens, a tabletcomputer, a mobile phone, a mobile computing device having a camera anda display device, or other suitable type of device that is capable ofdisplaying information on a surface. Further, display system 214 canalso include other display devices including at least one of a lightemitting diode (LED) display, a liquid crystal display (LCD), an organiclight emitting diode (OLED) display, a computer monitor, a flat paneldisplay, a heads-up display (HUD), or some other suitable device thatcan output information for the presentation of information.

Display system 214 is configured to display graphical user interface 222to human operator 224. In this illustrative example, graphical userinterface 222 can take the form of augmented reality display 226. Inaugmented reality display 226, information is displayed directly on alive view in a manner that augments the live view of one or moreobjects.

In this illustrative example, information can be displayed on a liveview of at least one of layup of layers 204, workpiece 206, laminate208, workpiece platform 230, or inspection platform 232. In someillustrative examples, the live view can be one seen through smartglasses, a tablet, or a mobile phone. In another illustrative example,information can be displayed without the display device to view theobject. For example, information can be displayed directly on thephysical object itself using a projector, such as a laser projector.

Human operator 224 is a person that can interact with graphical userinterface 222 through user input 225 generated by input system 216.Input system 216 is a physical hardware system and can be selected fromat least one of a mouse, a keyboard, a gesture detection device, acamera, a virtual reality glove, a microphone, a gaze tracker, a motiondetector, or some other suitable type of input device. In thisillustrative example, when a camera is present in input system 216, thecamera can also function as a sensor in sensors system 212. In otherwords, an overlap in functions for devices can be present.

In this illustrative example, human operator 224 places layers ofmaterials 228 on workpiece platform 230 to create layup of layers 204.These layers can be sheets cut from rolls of materials. When complete,layup of layers 204 forms workpiece 206.

Workpiece platform 230 is a physical structure that supports layup oflayers 204 laid up on workpiece platform 230 to form workpiece 206.Layup of layers 204 can be laid up on a tool on workpiece platform 230.This tool can be, for example, a metal caul plate, a contour layup tool,a fixture, a form, or some other suitable tool.

After workpiece 206 is cured to form laminate 208, laminate 208 can beplaced on inspection platform 232. As depicted, inspection platform 232is a physical structure that supports laminate 208 formed from workpiece206. Workpiece platform 230 can be inspection platform 232. In otherwords, these two functional blocks can be implemented using the samephysical structure.

In this illustrative example, sensor system 212 records at least one oflayup information 234 about one of layup of layers 204 on workpieceplatform 230 or inspection information 236 about laminate 208 located oninspection platform 232. In this depicted example, layup information 234and inspection information 236 can include at least one of video,images, or audio about layup of layers 204 that form workpiece 206.

In some illustrative examples, layup information 234 can also includeuser input 225. When user input 225 is generated by input system 216,user input 225 can be sent to sensor system 212 for use in generatinglayup information 234. Additionally, user input 225 can be consideredseparate from layup information 234 and can be sent directly to analyzer218 from input system 216. In other words, user input 225 can be part oflayup information 234 or can be separate from layup information 234.Sensor system 212 sends layup information 234 and inspection information236 to analyzer 218.

As depicted, analyzer 218 in computer system 220 identifies laminatenonconformance 238. Analyzer 218 can be implemented in software,hardware, firmware, or a combination thereof. When software is used, theoperations performed by analyzer 218 can be implemented in program codeconfigured to run on hardware, such as a processor unit. When firmwareis used, the operations performed by analyzer 218 can be implemented inprogram code and data and stored in persistent memory to run on aprocessor unit. When hardware is employed, the hardware can includecircuits that operate to perform the operations in analyzer 218.

In the illustrative examples, the hardware can take a form selected fromat least one of a circuit system, an integrated circuit, an applicationspecific integrated circuit (ASIC), a programmable logic device, or someother suitable type of hardware configured to perform a number ofoperations. With a programmable logic device, the device can beconfigured to perform the number of operations. The device can bereconfigured at a later time or can be permanently configured to performthe number of operations. Programmable logic devices include, forexample, a programmable logic array, a programmable array logic, a fieldprogrammable logic array, a field programmable gate array, and othersuitable hardware devices. Additionally, the processes can beimplemented in organic components integrated with inorganic componentsand can be comprised entirely of organic components excluding a humanbeing. For example, the processes can be implemented as circuits inorganic semiconductors.

Computer system 220 is a physical hardware system and includes one ormore data processing systems. When more than one data processing systemis present in computer system 220, those data processing systems are incommunication with each other using a communications medium. Thecommunications medium can be a network. The data processing systems canbe selected from at least one of a computer, a server computer, a tabletcomputer, or some other suitable data processing system.

In this illustrative example, analyzer 218 can identify laminatenonconformance 238 in laminate 208 using inspection information 236 andgenerate nonconformance information 240 about laminate nonconformance238. In some illustrative examples, analyzer 218 can identify laminatenonconformance 238 in laminate 208 using layup information 234 andinspection information 236. In this illustrative example, nonconformanceinformation 240 describing laminate nonconformance 238 comprises atleast one of a location, a region containing the nonconformance, anonconformance type, a laminate status, a laminate part number, laminateconstituent parts, or other suitable information that describes or isrelated to laminate nonconformance 238.

As depicted, the identification of laminate nonconformance 238 and thegeneration of nonconformance information 240 can be performed byartificial intelligence system 242. Artificial intelligence system 242is a system that has intelligent behavior and can be based on a functionof the human brain.

An artificial intelligence system comprises at least one of anartificial neural network, a cognitive system, a Bayesian network, fuzzylogic, an expert system, a natural language system, a cognitive system,or some other suitable system. Machine learning is used to train theartificial intelligence system. Machine learning involves inputting datato the process and allowing the process to adjust and improve thefunction of the artificial intelligence system.

A cognitive system is a computing system that mimics the function of ahuman brain. The cognitive system can be, for example, IBM Watsonavailable from International Business Machines Corporation.

In the illustrative example, analyzer 218 displays nonconformanceinformation 240 about the nonconformance in laminate 208 using displaysystem 214 for augmented reality display 226. This display ofnonconformance information 240 is on a live view of laminate 208. Thelive view can be used directly by human operator 224 without anintervening display device. This type of display can be performed usinga projector such as a laser projector, a video projector, or a digitalprojector.

In another example, a camera can capture images of laminate 208. Theseimages can be displayed on a display device with a live view of laminate208 that is augmented with nonconformance information 240.

As depicted, analyzer 218 can request user input 225 to verify whetheran identification of laminate nonconformance 238 in laminate 208identified by analyzer 218 is correct based on a setting that indicatesa human operator is to be prompted for the verification. This settingcan be a default setting in which a verification is always requested ora setting selected by a user. The setting may be, for example, based onan event such as requesting a verification after every fifth laminatethat is inspected.

In another example, the identification of laminate nonconformance 238 ismade with a level of confidence. The level of confidence indicates howlikely laminate nonconformance 238 is believed to be present.

As depicted, analyzer 218 requests user input 225 to verify whether anidentification of laminate nonconformance 238 in laminate 208 identifiedby analyzer 218 is correct when the identification of laminatenonconformance 238 in laminate 208 identified by analyzer 218 has aconfidence level that is less than a threshold for proceeding withoutuser input 225. The threshold may be, for example, 88 percent, 95percent, 98 percent, or some other level. The threshold can be selected,for example, using a specification or design rules.

In response to a request for verification by analyzer 218, humanoperator 224 generates user input 225 to verify whether laminatenonconformance 238 in laminate 208 identified by analyzer 218 ispresent.

Further, although the illustrative example is described in respect toprocessing layup of layers 204 to form laminate 208, nonconformancemanagement system 210 can be used with laying layers for multipleworkpieces. For example, eight workpieces, 10 workpieces, or 26workpieces can be laid up on a first tool, such as a first metal caulplate, on workpiece platform 230. A second tool such as a second metalcaul plate, can be placed on top of a stack of workpieces. This data canbe referred to as a tray. The tray can be moved to a press that appliespressure and heat to the tray to form a stack of laminates.

The tray containing the laminates can then be moved to inspectionplatform 232. An inspection can be performed on the laminates byanalyzer 218 using sensor system 212 to generate inspection information236 for each of the laminates in the tray. Inspection information 236can be analyzed using artificial intelligence system 242 to determinewhether any inconsistencies are present in the stack of laminates.

Additionally, analyzer 218 can predict an occurrence of laminatenonconformance 238 for laminate 208 before layup of layers 204 are curedto form laminate 208 using layup information 234 recorded during theprocess of forming layup of layers 204. This prediction can be made byanalyzer 218 using artificial intelligence system 242. As a result,layup of layers 204 may be reworked before being cured to form laminate208. As a result, laminate nonconformance 238 predicted by analyzer 218can be avoided. Thus, a lower occurrence of inconsistencies in laminates202 can occur through predictive identifications of nonconformances byartificial intelligence system 242.

With reference next to FIG. 3, an illustration of a dataflow forpredicting a nonconformance is depicted in accordance with anillustrative embodiment. In the illustrative examples, the samereference numeral may be used in more than one figure. This reuse of areference numeral in different figures represents the same element inthe different figures.

In this illustrative example, analyzer 218 in computer system 220 usesartificial intelligence system 242 to predict the presence of laminatenonconformance 238 in laminate 208. As depicted, sensor system 212records layup information 234 from laying up layers in layup of layers204 to form workpiece 206 which is in turn cured to form laminate 208.

Analyzer 218 can generate prediction 300 for laminate nonconformance 238occurring in laminate 208 based on layup information 234 for layup oflayers 204. In this illustrative example, layup information 234 can begenerated continuously as layers in layup of layers 204 are placed toform workpiece 206. Layup information 234 can be sent as generated,periodically, when layup of layers 204 is complete, or some combinationthereof.

In the illustrative example, layup information 234 includes images orvideo of layers within layup of layers 204. This information can bepresent for each layer placed to form layup of layers 204. Theinformation can be analyzed to identify layup nonconformance 304 withinlayup of layers 204 for workpiece 206, prior to workpiece 206 beingcured to form laminate 208. Layup nonconformance 304 can include atleast one of a wrinkle in a layer, foreign object debris, a missingalignment of a layer, or some other nonconformance.

As depicted, prediction 300 is generated prior to curing workpiece 206to form laminate 208. Prediction 300 can include the probability thatlaminate nonconformance 238 occurs in laminate 208. In some cases, thepresence of layup nonconformance 304 will not result in laminatenonconformance 238 in laminate 208.

Further, analyzer 218 can also generate change information 302indicating a change in layup of layers 204 that reduces a probabilitythat laminate nonconformance 238 will be present when layup of layers204 is cured to form laminate 208. In this example, prediction 300 andchange information 302 are generated by analyzer 218 using artificialintelligence system 242.

Analyzer 218 displays change information 302 indicating the change inlayup of layers 204 on a live view of layup of layers 204 using displaysystem 214 for augmented reality display 226. In this illustrativeexample, change information 302 can include instructions to resolvelayup nonconformance 304 in layup of layers 204 such that theprobability that laminate nonconformance 238 will be present when layupof layers 204 is cured to form laminate 208 is reduced.

Further, the identification of layup nonconformance 304 can be used byhuman operator 224 to make a change in layup of layers 204 to reduce theprobability that laminate nonconformance 238 will occur in laminate 208.Change information 302 can include at least one of a layupnonconformance type for a layup nonconformance, a location in the layupof layers containing the layup nonconformance, or an instruction toresolve the layup nonconformance.

With reference now to FIG. 4, an illustration of a dataflow for managinga nonconformance in a laminate is depicted in accordance with anillustrative embodiment. In this illustrative example, laminate 208 isplaced on inspection platform 232. Sensor system 212 generatesinspection information 236 about laminate 208. Analyzer 218 identifieslaminate nonconformance 238 has been identified as being present usinginspection information 236.

As depicted, status 400 is determined for laminate 208. Status 400 canbe, for example, acceptable, rework, or discard in this particularexample. Additionally, status 400 can include laminate yield, which canbe based on width, fixed length, and material type in this example.

Part of determining status 400 can be whether laminate nonconformance238 in laminate 208 affects a set of parts 402 that can be formed fromlaminate 208. This determination can be made by examining patterns 404.The set of parts 402 is identified using nonconformance information 240about laminate nonconformance 238. As depicted, nonconformanceinformation 240 describing laminate nonconformance 238 comprises atleast one of a location, a region containing the nonconformance, anonconformance type, a laminate status, a laminate part number, laminateconstituent parts, or other suitable information that describes or isrelated to laminate nonconformance 238.

In this illustrative example, the part type of parts 402 can be based onthe materials in laminate 208. This part type can be obtained from anidentifier, such as identifier 254, which may take the form of abarcode, a radio frequency identifier (RFID) chip, a graphic, text, orsome other suitable type of item that can be placed on or in workpiece206 that remains in place when laminate 208 is formed.

In this example, a location of laminate nonconformance 238 and a regionor extent of laminate nonconformance 238 can be used to determinewhether laminate 208 can be used to fabricate the set of parts 402. Inthis illustrative example, analyzer 218 can display pattern 406 for theset of parts 402 onto laminate 208. Further, analyzer 218 can alsodisplay region 408 at the location of laminate nonconformance 238.

In one illustrative example, human operator 224 can view pattern 406with respect to region 408 encompassing laminate nonconformance 238 aspart of augmented reality display 226. A visual inspection can be madeby human operator 224 to determine whether laminate 208 is usable forthe set of parts 402 in pattern 406. If region 408 is within the cutoutin pattern 406 for a part in the set of parts 402, human operator 224can change the orientation of pattern 406 to determine whether thechange in pattern results in laminate 208 being usable for fabricatingthe set of parts 402 using pattern 406.

If laminate 208 is not suitable for use in fabricating the set of parts402 using pattern 406, another pattern in patterns 404 can be displayedon laminate 208. The different pattern may have at least one of adifferent orientation or spacing of parts for the same part as pattern406. The other pattern may have different types of parts that may bemore suitable for fabricating those parts.

The process can also be performed by artificial intelligence system 242.The selected pattern in patterns 404 and the orientation enableslaminate 208 to be displayed on laminate 208 in augmented realitydisplay 226 to human operator 224. Human operator 224 can generate userinput 225 to verify that the selection is correct or to select adifferent pattern. Further, if more than one pattern is identified inpatterns 404 as being usable to form laminate 208, those options canalso be displayed to human operator 224 for selecting the appropriatepattern for laminate 208.

With reference now to FIG. 5, an illustration of a dataflow for trainingan artificial intelligence system to manage laminate nonconformances inlaminates is depicted in accordance with an illustrative embodiment. Inthis illustrative example, trainer 500 is operated to train artificialintelligence system 242.

As depicted, trainer 500 can implement machine learning techniques 502to train artificial intelligence system 242. The training of artificialintelligence system 242 can be performed using prior layup information504 recorded for prior layup of layers 506 for prior workpieces 508,prior inspection information 510 about prior laminates 512 formed fromprior workpieces 508, and prior user input 514 identifying priorlaminate nonconformances 515 in prior laminates 512.

For example, trainer 500 can train artificial intelligence system 242using sensor system 212 that records prior layup information 504 forprior workpieces 508 and prior inspection information 510 about priorlaminates 512 formed from prior workpieces 508. Additionally, thetraining can also be performed using prior user input 514 identifyingprior laminate nonconformances 515 in prior laminates 512 that arereceived from input system 216.

This training can be performed using machine learning techniques 502 toenable artificial intelligence system 242 to identify laminatenonconformance 238 in laminate 208. This information forms the data ordata sets that are used by trainer 500 to train artificial intelligencesystem 242.

With respect to training artificial intelligence system 242 usingmachine learning techniques 502, trainer 500 can include one or morecategories of machine learning techniques 502 for training artificialintelligence system models for artificial intelligence system 242.Artificial intelligence system 242 includes one or more artificialintelligence system models which are trained to perform different taskssuch as detecting nonconformances, predicting nonconformances,determining whether laminates can be used when nonconformances arepresent in the laminates, as well as other tasks.

In this illustrative example, these categories are supervised learningalgorithm 516, unsupervised learning algorithm 518, reinforcementlearning algorithm 520, and transfer learning algorithm 521. Asdepicted, artificial intelligence system 242 can be trained using atleast one of supervised learning algorithm 516, unsupervised learningalgorithm 518, reinforcement learning algorithm 520, or transferlearning algorithm 521.

In the illustrated example, supervised learning algorithm 516 comprisesproviding artificial intelligence system 242 with training data and thecorrect output value of the data. During supervised learning, the valuesfor the output are provided along with the training data (labeleddataset) for the model building process. The algorithm, through trialand error, deciphers the patterns that exist between the input trainingdata and the known output values to create a model that can reproducethe same underlying rules with new data. This model is a component inartificial intelligence system 242. Examples of supervised learningalgorithms include regression analysis, decision trees, k-nearestneighbors, neural networks, and support vector machines.

If unsupervised learning algorithm 518 is used, not all of the variablesand data patterns are labeled, forcing the artificial intelligencemachine model in artificial intelligence system 242 to discover hiddenpatterns and create labels on its own through the use of unsupervisedlearning algorithm 518. Unsupervised learning algorithm 518 has theadvantage of discovering patterns in the data with no need for labeleddatasets. Examples of unsupervised learning algorithms used inunsupervised machine learning to train artificial intelligence system242 include k-means clustering, association analysis, and descendingclustering.

Whereas supervised learning algorithm 516 and unsupervised learningalgorithm 518 cause the artificial intelligence model in artificialintelligence system 242 to learn from a dataset, reinforcement learningalgorithm 520 results in the artificial intelligence model in artificialintelligence system 242 learning from interactions with an environment.This environment can be detected through sensor system 212 and inputsystem 216. Reinforcement learning algorithm 520 can be, for example,Q-learning, which is used to train the artificial intelligence model inartificial intelligence system 242 through interacting with theenvironment using measurable performance criteria.

In this illustrative example, transfer learning algorithm 521 is anothermachine learning technique that can be used to train artificialintelligence system 242. This particular machine learning technique canbe used to use a pre-existing artificial intelligence system that hasbeen pre-trained with a data set for a different purpose. In otherwords, artificial intelligence system 214 can be a pre-existingartificial intelligence system that has been trained to extract featuresfrom images for a different purpose. For example, artificialintelligence system 242 can already be trained to extract features andclassify those features to identify tools in the images. With transferlearning algorithm 521, artificial intelligence system 242 can bemodified or provided with new rules to perform classification toidentify nonconformances. In this manner, the training enablesartificial intelligence system 242 to extract features that have alreadybeen performed before using transfer learning algorithm 521. Thetraining using transfer learning algorithm 521 can take advantage of thefact that artificial intelligence system 242 can be trained to extractfeatures. The training focuses on classification to identifynonconformances.

Additionally, reinforcement or additional training can occur even afterartificial intelligence system 242 is operating to detectnonconformances, predict nonconformances, or determine whether laminateswith nonconformances can be used. For example, the process of laying uplayers of material for layup of layers 204 to form workpiece 206 can berecorded in sensor system 212. Further, the identification of layupnonconformances in layup of layers 204 can also be identified in userinput 225.

At this point in time, human operator 224 generate user input 225 toidentify layup nonconformances seen by human operator 224 during thelayup of each layer in layup of layers 204. The user input can alsoindicate whether the particular nonconformance would cause a laminatenonconformance in the laminate resulting from curing the layup oflayers. Further, the identification of laminate nonconformances can bein user input 225 generated by human operator 224 when inspectinglaminate 208. In other words, human operator 224 through gestures canindicate where a particular laminate nonconformance is present.

Human operator 224 can also verify the extent of the laminatenonconformance, nonconformance type, and other information about thelaminate nonconformance. Sensor system 212 can record video or images ofthe laminate inspected by human operator 224. User input 225 andinspection information 236 are used to train artificial intelligencesystem 242. This verification of whether a laminate nonconformance 238is present in user input 225 and inspection information 236 can be usedby trainer 500 to further train artificial intelligence system 242.

In some illustrative examples, the training also may include using layupinformation 234. Layup information 234 may be used in trainingartificial intelligence system 242 to identify when particular layupnonconformances in layers in layup of layers 204 results in laminatenonconformance 238 in laminate 208. This additional training canincrease the accuracy at which artificial intelligence system 242identifies laminate nonconformances.

Further, when the training also includes layup information 234 inaddition to inspection information 236, analyzer 218 using artificialintelligence system 242 can operate to predict when a laminatenonconformance may occur.

Further, a root cause analysis of prior layup of layers 506 for priorworkpieces 508 that were cured to form prior laminates 512 can beperformed. This analysis can be performed to generate nonconformance map522. Nonconformance map 522 is information that can be used by trainer500 to train artificial intelligence system 242 to predict theoccurrence of laminate nonconformances based on layup information.

Nonconformance map 522 identifies the occurrence of laminatenonconformances based on layup nonconformances. The layupnonconformances in nonconformance map 522 can include at least one of awrinkle, a crease, a dent, a washout, an incorrect layup of layers, acontaminant, dirt, debris, or other nonconformances occurring during thelayup of layers for workpieces.

In one illustrative example, one or more technical solutions are presentthat overcome a technical problem with accurately identifyingnonconformances in laminates using current techniques in which humanoperators perform inspections of laminates. As a result, one or moretechnical solutions can provide a technical effect enabling a computersystem to automatically inspect laminates for nonconformances, predictthe occurrence of nonconformances during the layup of layers forworkpieces cured to form laminates, display change instructions duringthe layup process to reduce nonconformances in laminates, or reduce thediscarding of laminates through pattern selection for parts.

Thus, the illustrative examples provide a method, an apparatus, and asystem for managing the manufacturing of laminates. Nonconformancemanagement system 210 operates to reduce nonconformances in laminates.Further, the system can also operate to perform root cause analysis toidentify causes of nonconformances occurring prior to a workpiececomprising a layup of layers being cured to form the laminate. Further,nonconformance management system 210 can be used to perform partselection for a laminate when a nonconformance is present in a laminate.

Nonconformance management system 210 can employ graphical user interface222 in the form of augmented reality display 226 that is displayeddirectly on laminate 208. Additionally, artificial intelligence system242 and nonconformance management system 210 can be trained to identifylaminate nonconformances that can be verified by human operator 224.Further, artificial intelligence system 242 can operate to predictcauses of laminate nonconformances and display change information 302that can be used to reduce the occurrence of laminate nonconformancesprior to curing workpieces.

Computer system 220 can be configured to perform at least one of thesteps, operations, or actions described in the different illustrativeexamples using software, hardware, firmware, or a combination thereof.As a result, computer system 220 operates as a special purpose computersystem in which analyzer 218 in computer system 220 enables at least oneof managing the manufacture of laminates during at least one of placinglayers of material to form a layup of layers to form a workpiece, moreaccurately identifying nonconformances during inspection of laminates,or selecting patterns for parts when nonconformances are present inlaminates. In particular, analyzer 218 transforms computer system 220into a special purpose computer system as compared to currentlyavailable general computer systems that do not have analyzer 218. In theillustrative examples, analyzer 218 includes a practical application ofartificial intelligence system 242.

In the illustrative example, the use of analyzer 218 in computer system220 integrates processes into a practical application for managing themanufacturing of laminates that increases the performance of computersystem 220. In other words, analyzer 218 in computer system 220 isdirected to a practical application of processes integrated intoanalyzer 218 in computer system 220 that identifies nonconformances in alaminate from inspection information detected by a sensor system inwhich inspection information is processed using artificial intelligencesystem 242. In this manner, through training, analyzer 218 can useartificial intelligence system 242 in a manner that is improved ascompared to current techniques in which human operators perform variousoperations.

The illustration of laminate manufacturing environment 200 in thedifferent components in FIGS. 2-4 are not meant to imply physical orarchitectural limitations to the manner in which an illustrativeembodiment may be implemented. Other components in addition to or inplace of the ones illustrated may be used. Some components may beunnecessary. Also, the blocks are presented to illustrate somefunctional components. One or more of these blocks may be combined,divided, or combined and divided into different blocks when implementedin an illustrative embodiment.

For example, workpiece platform 230 and inspection platform 232 may alsobe considered part of nonconformance management system 210 in someillustrative examples. In another illustrative example, artificialintelligence system 242 can be part of analyzer 218 instead of beingseparate components. In yet another illustrative example, videos inlayup information 234 containing correct procedures for reducing theoccurrence of layup nonconformances that results in laminatenonconformances can be presented to human operators. These videos can bepresented as part of change information 302 when a layup nonconformanceis identified in a layer of material being laid up in a layup of layersthat form a workpiece. In another illustrative example, these videos canbe used as part of a separate training processor class for humanoperators.

With reference next to FIG. 6, an illustration of an augmented realitydisplay of nonconformance information on a laminate is depicted inaccordance with an illustrative embodiment. As depicted in this example,laminate 600 is located on inspection platform 602. Laminate 600 is anexample of one physical implementation for laminate 208 shown in blockform in FIG. 2. Inspection platform 602 is an example of one physicalimplementation for inspection platform 232 shown in block form in FIG.2.

In this illustrative example, laminate nonconformance 604 is present inlaminate 600. In this example, laminate nonconformance 604 is a wrinklein laminate 600. Laminate nonconformance 604 is an example of laminatenonconformance 238 shown in block form in FIG. 2.

As depicted, region 606 is displayed on laminate 600 around laminatenonconformance 604. The display of region 606 is performed using a laserprojector. Further, nonconformance information 608 is displayed onlaminate 600. Nonconformance information 608 is an example ofnonconformance information 240 shown in block form in FIG. 2.

As depicted, nonconformance information 608 can include at least one ofnonconformance type, correlated information identifying the location oflaminate nonconformance 604, a laminate part number, laminate materials,or other suitable information relating to laminate nonconformance 604.

In this illustrative example, laminate materials, laminate part number,and other suitable information can be identified in a number ofdifferent ways. For example, barcode 611 is located on laminate 600 inthis example. Barcode 611 can be used to identify the layers, materialsfor layers, such as raw materials used to form the layers, and otherinformation about the layup of layers used to form the workpiece curedto form laminate 600.

Further, verification prompt 610 is also displayed on laminate 600. Thisprompt requests user input to indicate whether the identification oflaminate nonconformance 604 is correct. As depicted, the display isperformed by overlaying information on a live view of laminate 600 toprovide an augmented reality display to the human operator. In thisexample, the user can request an analyzer for correction/clarificationand verification of the identified nonconformance, part layoutselection, or some combination thereof.

Further, list of nonconformances 612 can be displayed on laminate 600.List of nonconformance 612 are nonconformances identified as beingpotential candidates for laminate nonconformance 604. This list can bedisplayed as part of training the artificial intelligence system. Forexample, if the artificial intelligence system is unsure as to thepresence of a particular nonconformance, the artificial intelligencesystem can display these options in list of nonconformances 612. Thislist can be displayed in place of or in addition to verification prompt610.

With reference next to FIG. 7, an illustration of a display of a patternon a laminate is depicted in accordance with an illustrative embodiment.In this depicted example, pattern 700 is displayed on laminate 600 by alaser projector. Pattern 700 is an example of pattern 406 shown in blockform in FIG. 4.

As depicted, Pattern 700 identifies cutouts for parts. In this example,the cutouts include cutout 702, cutout 704, cutout 706, cutout 708,cutout 710, and cutout 712. A cutout is a portion of laminate 600 thatis removed from laminate 600 to form a part.

As depicted, laminate nonconformance 604 does not interfere with cuttingup laminate 600 to obtain cutouts for parts, as shown by the overlay ofpattern 700 onto laminate 600. If laminate nonconformance 604 waslocated within a cutout part, pattern 700 can be reoriented or anotherpattern for another type of part could be selected and displayed onlaminate 600 to determine whether laminate 600 is usable. When, laminatenonconformance 604 is located within a cutout or multiple cutouts forpattern 700, laminate 600 can be used to fabricate parts with fewerparts being fabricated from laminate 600.

With reference next to FIG. 8, an illustration of a display of changeinformation for a layer of material in a workpiece is depicted inaccordance with an illustrative embodiment. In this illustrativeexample, layer of material 800 is laid up on layup platform 802.

In this example, layup nonconformance 804 is present in layer ofmaterial 800. In this example, layup nonconformance 804 is a wrinkle inlayer of material 800. As depicted, layup nonconformance 804 ispredicted to cause a nonconformance in the laminate that is created fromlayer of material 800. In this example, change information 806 isdisplayed directly on layer of material 800 with a laser projector.

As depicted, change information 806 includes graphical indicator 808identifying the outline of layup nonconformance 804. Additionally,change information 806 also includes instructions 810. In this example,instructions 810 are to smooth the wrinkle with a rod and also see avideo showing the technique to smooth wrinkles.

Turning next to FIG. 9, an illustration of a flowchart of a process formanaging manufacturing of a laminate is depicted in accordance with anillustrative embodiment. The process in FIG. 9 can be implemented inhardware, software, or both. When implemented in software, the processcan take the form of program code that is run by one of more processorunits located in one or more hardware devices in one or more computersystems. For example, the process can be implemented in analyzer 218 incomputer system 220 in FIG. 2.

The process begins by recording layup information about a layup oflayers on a workpiece platform, wherein the layup of layers forms aworkpiece (operation 900). The layup information is recorded by a sensorsystem, such as sensor system 212 shown in block form in FIG. 2. Theprocess records inspection information about the laminate on aninspection platform, wherein the laminate is formed from curing theworkpiece (operation 902). In operation 902, the inspection informationis also reported by sensor system 212. The layup information andinspection information can include at least one of video, images, audio,user input, or other suitable information.

The process receives a user input describing a laminate nonconformancein the laminate on the inspection platform (operation 904). The userinput is received from a user input system. The description of thelaminate nonconformance in the user input can include at least one of alocation of the laminate nonconformance, a region containing thelaminate nonconformance, a nonconformance type, a laminate status, orother suitable information that can be input by a human operatorinspecting the laminate.

In operation 904, the user input can be made through gestures detectedby a camera, a keyboard, a virtual reality glove, a microphone, or othersuitable types of input devices. For example, the location of thelaminate nonconformance can be made by the user employing gesturespointing to the location of the laminate nonconformance. In similarfashion, user input can be gestures that outline or define a region inwhich the laminate nonconformance is present.

The process trains an artificial intelligence system using the layupinformation, the inspection information, and the user input describingthe laminate nonconformance in the laminate present in the inspectioninformation (operation 906). The process terminates thereafter. Thetraining of the artificial intelligence system in operation 906 can beperformed using trainer 500 employing one or more of machine learningtechniques 502 in FIG. 5.

The training can result in one or more artificial intelligence systemmodels for the artificial intelligence system. These models can becontinued training to increase at least one of speed and accuracy ofnonconformances identified or predicted.

With reference now to FIG. 10, an illustration of a flowchart of aprocess for identifying laminate nonconformances in laminates isdepicted in accordance with an illustrative embodiment. The process inFIG. 10 can be implemented in hardware, software, or both. Whenimplemented in software, the process can take the form of program codethat is run by one of more processor units located in one or morehardware devices in one or more computer systems. For example, theprocess can be implemented in at least one of analyzer 218 or artificialintelligence system 242 in computer system 220 in FIG. 2.

The process begins by detecting the presence of a laminate forinspection (operation 1000). The process receives inspection informationfrom a sensor system (operation 1002). The inspection informationincludes at least one of video, images, or audio about the laminatebeing inspected.

The process determines whether a laminate nonconformance is presentusing the inspection information (operation 1004). In the illustrativeexample, operation 1004 is performed using an artificial intelligencesystem. In this example, the artificial intelligence system has beentrained using prior layup information recorded for prior layup of layersfor prior workpieces, prior inspection information about prior laminatesformed from the prior workpieces, and prior user input identifying priornonconformances in the prior laminates. The process terminatesthereafter.

With reference now to FIG. 11, an illustration of a flowchart of aprocess for predicting laminate nonconformances in laminates is depictedin accordance with an illustrative embodiment. The process in FIG. 11can be implemented in hardware, software, or both. When implemented insoftware, the process can take the form of program code that is run byone or more processor units located in one or more hardware devices inone or more computer systems. For example, the process can beimplemented in at least one of analyzer 218 or artificial intelligencesystem 242 in computer system 220 in FIG. 2.

The process begins by predicting a laminate nonconformance in a laminateusing layup information, wherein the laminate is formed from curing alayup of layers (operation 1100). Layup information is about the layupof layers to form the workpiece. This layup information can include atleast one of video, images, or audio.

For example, an image of a layer can be generated after the layer in thelayup of layers is placed to form the workpiece. In other illustrativeexamples, a video can be generated of the entire process that shows howlayers are laid or placed up by a human operator. The video also mayinclude instructions from the human operator explaining how to placelayers or remove nonconformances in different layers.

The prediction can be made at a number of different times. For example,the prediction can be made after each layer of material in the layup ofthe layer of materials is laid up or after the layup of layers iscompleted to form the workpiece.

The process generates change information indicating a change in thelayup of layers that reduces a probability that the laminatenonconformance will be present when the layup of layers is cured to formthe laminate (operation 1102). The process displays the changeinformation indicating the change in the layup of layers on a live viewof the layup of layers using a display system for an augmented realitydisplay (operation 1104). The process terminates thereafter. With thechange information, the workpiece or layers in the layup of layers inthe workpiece can be adjusted, reworked, or discarded, reducing themanufacturing of laminates that have laminate nonconformances.

With reference next to FIG. 12, an illustration of a flowchart of aprocess for processing a laminate with a laminate nonconformance isdepicted in accordance with an illustrative embodiment. The process inFIG. 12 can be implemented in hardware, software, or both. Whenimplemented in software, the process can take the form of program codethat is run by one or more processor units located in one or morehardware devices in one or more computer systems. For example, theprocess can be implemented in at least one of analyzer 218 or artificialintelligence system 242 in computer system 220 in FIG. 2.

The process receives inspection information for a laminate (operation1200). In this example, the process receives the inspection informationfrom a sensor system, such as sensor system 212 in FIG. 2. The processidentifies a laminate nonconformance in the laminate using theinspection information (operation 1202).

The process displays an identification of the laminate nonconformance ona live view of the laminate as an augmented reality display (operation1204). The identification can be a graphical indicator that is displayedin the laminate nonconformance. The graphical indicator can overlay orencompass the laminate nonconformance. The identification can alsoinclude other information, such as a nonconformance type.

The process displays a pattern for a set of parts on the live view ofthe laminate as part the augmented reality display (operation 1206). Theprocess terminates thereafter.

The display of the identification of the laminate nonconformance and thepattern can be viewed by a human operator to determine whether thelaminate can be used to fabricate the set of parts. In one example, ifthe laminate cannot be use with the current pattern, a different patterncan be selected for review by a human operator. In some cases, thelaminate nonconformance falls outside of a set of cutouts for the set ofparts. In other cases, when multiple parts are present in the set ofparts, the laminate nonconformance may only be within one cutout in thecutouts enabling the laminate to be used to fabricate some of the parts.

The flowcharts and block diagrams in the different depicted embodimentsillustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of somepossible implementations of apparatuses and methods in an illustrativeembodiment. In this regard, each block in the flowcharts or blockdiagrams can represent at least one of a module, a segment, a function,or a portion of an operation or step. For example, one or more of theblocks can be implemented as program code, hardware, or a combination ofthe program code and hardware. When implemented in hardware, thehardware can, for example, take the form of integrated circuits that aremanufactured or configured to perform one or more operations in theflowcharts or block diagrams. When implemented as a combination ofprogram code and hardware, the implementation may take the form offirmware. Each block in the flowcharts or the block diagrams can beimplemented using special purpose hardware systems that perform thedifferent operations or combinations of special purpose hardware andprogram code run by the special purpose hardware.

In some alternative implementations of an illustrative embodiment, thefunction or functions noted in the blocks may occur out of the ordernoted in the figures. For example, in some cases, two blocks shown insuccession may be performed substantially concurrently, or the blocksmay sometimes be performed in the reverse order, depending upon thefunctionality involved. Also, other blocks may be added in addition tothe illustrated blocks in a flowchart or block diagram.

Turning now to FIG. 13, an illustration of a block diagram of a dataprocessing system is depicted in accordance with an illustrativeembodiment. Data processing system 1300 can be used to implement servercomputer 104 and client computer 106 in FIG. 1. Data processing system1300 can also be used to implement computer system 220 in FIG. 2.

In this illustrative example, data processing system 1300 includescommunications framework 1302, which provides communications betweenprocessor unit 1304, memory 1306, persistent storage 1308,communications unit 1310, input/output (I/O) unit 1312, and display1314. In this example, communications framework 1302 takes the form of abus system.

Processor unit 1304 serves to execute instructions for software that canbe loaded into memory 1306. Processor unit 1304 includes one or moreprocessors. For example, processor unit 1304 can be selected from atleast one of a multicore processor, a central processing unit (CPU), agraphics processing unit (GPU), a physics processing unit (PPU), adigital signal processor (DSP), a network processor, or some othersuitable type of processor.

Memory 1306 and persistent storage 1308 are examples of storage devices1316. A storage device is any piece of hardware that is capable ofstoring information, such as, for example, without limitation, at leastone of data, program code in functional form, or other suitableinformation either on a temporary basis, a permanent basis, or both on atemporary basis and a permanent basis. Storage devices 1316 may also bereferred to as computer-readable storage devices in these illustrativeexamples. Memory 1306, in these examples, can be, for example, arandom-access memory or any other suitable volatile or non-volatilestorage device. Persistent storage 1308 can take various forms,depending on the particular implementation.

For example, persistent storage 1308 may contain one or more componentsor devices. For example, persistent storage 1308 can be a hard drive, asolid-state drive (SSD), a flash memory, a rewritable optical disk, arewritable magnetic tape, or some combination of the above. The mediaused by persistent storage 1308 also can be removable. For example, aremovable hard drive can be used for persistent storage 1308.

Communications unit 1310, in these illustrative examples, provides forcommunications with other data processing systems or devices. In theseillustrative examples, communications unit 1310 is a network interfacecard.

Input/output unit 1312 allows for input and output of data with otherdevices that can be connected to data processing system 1300. Forexample, input/output unit 1312 can provide a connection for user inputthrough at least one of a keyboard, a mouse, or some other suitableinput device. Further, input/output unit 1312 can send output to aprinter. Display 1314 provides a mechanism to display information to auser.

Instructions for at least one of the operating system, applications, orprograms can be located in storage devices 1316, which are incommunication with processor unit 1304 through communications framework1302. The processes of the different embodiments can be performed byprocessor unit 1304 using computer-implemented instructions, which canbe located in a memory, such as memory 1306.

These instructions are referred to as program code, computer usableprogram code, or computer-readable program code that can be read andexecuted by a processor in processor unit 1304. The program code in thedifferent embodiments can be embodied on different physical orcomputer-readable storage media, such as memory 1306 or persistentstorage 1308.

Program code 1318 is located in a functional form on computer-readablemedia 1320 that is selectively removable and can be loaded onto ortransferred to data processing system 1300 for execution by processorunit 1304. Program code 1318 and computer-readable media 1320 formcomputer program product 1322 in these illustrative examples. In theillustrative example, computer-readable media 1320 is computer-readablestorage media 1324.

In these illustrative examples, computer-readable storage media 1324 isa physical or tangible storage device used to store program code 1318rather than a medium that propagates or transmits program code 1318.

Alternatively, program code 1318 can be transferred to data processingsystem 1300 using a computer-readable signal media. Thecomputer-readable signal media can be, for example, a propagated datasignal containing program code 1318. For example, the computer-readablesignal media can be at least one of an electromagnetic signal, anoptical signal, or any other suitable type of signal. These signals canbe transmitted over connections, such as wireless connections, opticalfiber cable, coaxial cable, a wire, or any other suitable type ofconnection.

The different components illustrated for data processing system 1300 arenot meant to provide architectural limitations to the manner in whichdifferent embodiments can be implemented. In some illustrative examples,one or more of the components may be incorporated in or otherwise form aportion of, another component. For example, memory 1306, or portionsthereof, can be incorporated in processor unit 1304 in some illustrativeexamples. The different illustrative embodiments can be implemented in adata processing system including components in addition to or in placeof those illustrated for data processing system 1300. Other componentsshown in FIG. 13 can be varied from the illustrative examples shown. Thedifferent embodiments can be implemented using any hardware device orsystem capable of running program code 1318.

Illustrative embodiments of the disclosure may be described in thecontext of aircraft manufacturing and service method 1400 as shown inFIG. 14 and aircraft 1500 as shown in FIG. 15. Turning first to FIG. 14,an illustration of a block diagram of an aircraft manufacturing andservice method is depicted in accordance with an illustrativeembodiment. During pre-production, aircraft manufacturing and servicemethod 1400 may include specification and design 1402 of aircraft 1500in FIG. 15 and material procurement 1404.

During production, component and subassembly manufacturing 1406 andsystem integration 1408 of aircraft 1500 in FIG. 15 takes place.Thereafter, aircraft 1500 in FIG. 15 can go through certification anddelivery 1410 in order to be placed in service 1412. While in service1412 by a customer, aircraft 1500 in FIG. 15 is scheduled for routinemaintenance and service 1414, which may include modification,reconfiguration, refurbishment, and other maintenance or service.

Each of the processes of aircraft manufacturing and service method 1400may be performed or carried out by a system integrator, a third party,an operator, or some combination thereof. In these examples, theoperator may be a customer. For the purposes of this description, asystem integrator may include, without limitation, any number ofaircraft manufacturers and major-system subcontractors; a third partymay include, without limitation, any number of vendors, subcontractors,and suppliers; and an operator may be an airline, a leasing company, amilitary entity, a service organization, and so on.

With reference now to FIG. 15, an illustration of a block diagram of anaircraft is depicted in which an illustrative embodiment may beimplemented. In this example, aircraft 1500 is produced by aircraftmanufacturing and service method 1400 in FIG. 14 and may includeairframe 1502 with plurality of systems 1504 and interior 1506. Examplesof systems 1504 include one or more of propulsion system 1508,electrical system 1510, hydraulic system 1512, and environmental system1514. Any number of other systems may be included. Although an aerospaceexample is shown, different illustrative embodiments may be applied toother industries, such as the automotive industry.

Apparatuses and methods embodied herein may be employed during at leastone of the stages of aircraft manufacturing and service method 1400 inFIG. 14.

In one illustrative example, components or subassemblies produced incomponent and subassembly manufacturing 1406 in FIG. 14 can befabricated or manufactured in a manner similar to components orsubassemblies produced while aircraft 1500 is in service 1412 in FIG.14. As yet another example, one or more apparatus embodiments, methodembodiments, or a combination thereof can be utilized during productionstages, such as component and subassembly manufacturing 1406 and systemintegration 1408 in FIG. 14. One or more apparatus embodiments, methodembodiments, or a combination thereof may be utilized while aircraft1500 is in service 1412, during maintenance and service 1414 in FIG. 14,or both.

For example, analyzer 218 can be used during at least one of componentand subassembly manufacturing 1406 or maintenance and service 1414 tomanufacturing parts from laminates. The efficiency can be increased andthe cost can be decreased in manufacturing parts by employingnonconformance management system 210 to reduce nonconformances inlaminates used for parts. The use of a number of the differentillustrative embodiments may substantially expedite the assembly ofaircraft 1500, reduce the cost of aircraft 1500, or both expedite theassembly of aircraft 1500 and reduce the cost of aircraft 1500.

Turning now to FIG. 16, an illustration of a block diagram of a productmanagement system is depicted in accordance with an illustrativeembodiment. Product management system 1600 is a physical hardwaresystem. In this illustrative example, product management system 1600includes at least one of manufacturing system 1602 or maintenance system1604.

Manufacturing system 1602 is configured to manufacture products, such asaircraft 1500 in FIG. 15. As depicted, manufacturing system 1602includes manufacturing equipment 1606. Manufacturing equipment 1606includes at least one of fabrication equipment 1608 or assemblyequipment 1610.

Fabrication equipment 1608 is equipment that used to fabricatecomponents for parts used to form aircraft 1500 in FIG. 15. For example,fabrication equipment 1608 can include machines and tools. Thesemachines and tools can be at least one of a drill, a hydraulic press, afurnace, a mold, a composite tape laying machine, a vacuum system, alathe, or other suitable types of equipment. Fabrication equipment 1608can be used to fabricate at least one of metal parts, composite parts,semiconductors, circuits, fasteners, ribs, skin panels, spars, antennas,or other suitable types of parts.

Assembly equipment 1610 is equipment used to assemble parts to formaircraft 1500 in FIG. 15. In particular, assembly equipment 1610 is usedto assemble components and parts to form aircraft 1500 in FIG. 15.Assembly equipment 1610 also can include machines and tools. Thesemachines and tools may be at least one of a robotic arm, a crawler, afaster installation system, a rail-based drilling system, or a robot.Assembly equipment 1610 can be used to assemble parts such as seats,horizontal stabilizers, wings, engines, engine housings, landing gearsystems, and other parts for aircraft 1500 in FIG. 15.

In this illustrative example, maintenance system 1604 includesmaintenance equipment 1612. Maintenance equipment 1612 can include anyequipment needed to perform maintenance on aircraft 1500 in FIG. 15.Maintenance equipment 1612 may include tools for performing differentoperations on parts on aircraft 1500 in FIG. 15. These operations caninclude at least one of disassembling parts, refurbishing parts,inspecting parts, reworking parts, manufacturing replacement parts, orother operations for performing maintenance on aircraft 1500 in FIG. 15.These operations can be for routine maintenance, inspections, upgrades,refurbishment, or other types of maintenance operations.

In the illustrative example, maintenance equipment 1612 may includeultrasonic inspection devices, x-ray imaging systems, vision systems,drills, crawlers, and other suitable devices. In some cases, maintenanceequipment 1612 can include fabrication equipment 1608, assemblyequipment 1610, or both to produce and assemble parts that needed formaintenance.

Product management system 1600 also includes control system 1614.Control system 1614 is a hardware system and may also include softwareor other types of components. Control system 1614 is configured tocontrol the operation of at least one of manufacturing system 1602 ormaintenance system 1604. In particular, control system 1614 can controlthe operation of at least one of fabrication equipment 1608, assemblyequipment 1610, or maintenance equipment 1612.

The hardware in control system 1614 can be implemented using hardwarethat may include computers, circuits, networks, and other types ofequipment. The control may take the form of direct control ofmanufacturing equipment 1606. For example, robots, computer-controlledmachines, and other equipment can be controlled by control system 1614.In other illustrative examples, control system 1614 can manageoperations performed by human operators 1616 in manufacturing orperforming maintenance on aircraft 1500. For example, control system1614 can assign tasks, provide instructions, display models, or performother operations to manage operations performed by human operators 1616.In these illustrative examples, nonconformance management system 210from FIG. 2 can be implemented in control system 1614 to manage at leastone of the manufacturing or maintenance of aircraft 1500 in FIG. 15. Forexample, analyzer 218 can operate to aid in identifying and reducingnonconformances in laminates manufactured for use in creating parts forat least one of manufacturing or performing maintenance on aircraft 1500in FIG. 15.

In the different illustrative examples, human operators 1616 can operateor interact with at least one of manufacturing equipment 1606,maintenance equipment 1612, or control system 1614. This interaction canoccur to manufacture aircraft 1500 in FIG. 15.

Of course, product management system 1600 may be configured to manageother products other than aircraft 1500 in FIG. 15. Although productmanagement system 1600 has been described with respect to manufacturingin the aerospace industry, product management system 1600 can beconfigured to manage products for other industries. For example, productmanagement system 1600 can be configured to manufacture products for theautomotive industry as well as any other suitable industries.

Thus, the illustrative examples provide a method, an apparatus, and asystem for managing nonconformances in laminates. In one illustrativeexample, a nonconformance management system comprises a sensor systemand an analyzer in a computer system. A workpiece platform supports alayup of layers laid up on the workpiece platform to form a workpiece.The inspection platform supports a laminate formed from the workpiece.The sensor that records layup information about the layup of layers onthe workpiece platform and records inspection information about thelaminate located on an inspection platform, wherein the laminate isformed from curing the workpiece. The analyzer in the computer systemidentifies a laminate nonconformance in the laminate using theinspection information; generates nonconformance information about thelaminate nonconformance, and displays the nonconformance informationabout the laminate nonconformance on the laminate using a display systemfor an augmented reality display.

The nonconformance management system operates to reduce nonconformancesoccurring in laminates. For example, the system can also operate toperform root cause analysis to identify causes of nonconformancesoccurring prior to a workpiece comprising a layup of layers being curedto form the laminate. The identification of causes can be used to makechanges to at least one of techniques employed to lay up layers,materials for layers, suppliers or layers, or other changes. Further,the system can be used to perform part selection for laminate when anonconformance is present in a laminate.

The description of the different illustrative embodiments has beenpresented for purposes of illustration and description and is notintended to be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments in the formdisclosed. The different illustrative examples describe components thatperform actions or operations. In an illustrative embodiment, acomponent can be configured to perform the action or operationdescribed. For example, the component can have a configuration or designfor a structure that provides the component an ability to perform theaction or operation that is described in the illustrative examples asbeing performed by the component.

Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinaryskill in the art. Further, different illustrative embodiments mayprovide different features as compared to other desirable embodiments.The embodiment or embodiments selected are chosen and described in orderto best explain the principles of the embodiments, the practicalapplication, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art tounderstand the disclosure for various embodiments with variousmodifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.

What is claimed is:
 1. A nonconformance management system comprising: aworkpiece platform that supports a layup of layers laid up on theworkpiece platform to form a workpiece; an inspection platform thatsupports a laminate formed from the workpiece; a sensor system thatrecords layup information about the layup of layers on the workpieceplatform and records inspection information about the laminate locatedon the inspection platform, wherein the laminate is formed from curingthe workpiece; and an analyzer in a computer system that identifies alaminate nonconformance in the laminate using the inspectioninformation, generates nonconformance information about the laminatenonconformance, and displays the nonconformance information about thelaminate nonconformance on the laminate using a display system for anaugmented reality display.
 2. The nonconformance management system ofclaim 1, wherein in identifying the laminate nonconformance in thelaminate using the inspection information, the analyzer identifies thelaminate nonconformance in the laminate using the layup information andthe inspection information.
 3. The nonconformance management system ofclaim 1, wherein the analyzer includes an artificial intelligence systemfurther comprising: an input system that receives a user input forverifying whether the laminate nonconformance in the laminate identifiedby the analyzer is present; and a trainer in the computer system thattrains the artificial intelligence system using the user input and theinspection information.
 4. The nonconformance management system of claim3, wherein the artificial intelligence system is trained using at leastone of a supervised learning algorithm, an unsupervised learningalgorithm, a reinforcement learning algorithm, or a transfer learningalgorithm.
 5. The nonconformance management system of claim 1, whereinthe analyzer includes an artificial intelligence system and furthercomprises: an input system that receives a user input, and wherein theanalyzer requests the user input to verify whether an identification ofthe laminate nonconformance in the laminate identified by the analyzeris correct when the identification of the laminate nonconformance in thelaminate identified by the analyzer has a confidence level that is lessthan a threshold for proceeding without the user input.
 6. Thenonconformance management system of claim 5 further comprising: atrainer in the computer system that trains the artificial intelligencesystem using the user input and the inspection information.
 7. Thenonconformance management system of claim 1, wherein the analyzerincludes an artificial intelligence system and further comprises: aninput system that receives a user input, and wherein the analyzerrequests the user input to verify whether an identification of thelaminate nonconformance in the laminate identified by the analyzer iscorrect as based on a setting that indicates that an operator is to beprompted for a verification.
 8. The nonconformance management system ofclaim 7 further comprising: a trainer in the computer system that trainsthe artificial intelligence system using the user input and theinspection information.
 9. The nonconformance management system of claim1, wherein in identifying the laminate nonconformance in the laminateusing the layup information, the analyzer identifies the laminatenonconformance in the laminate using an artificial intelligence systemtrained using prior layup information recorded for prior layup of layersfor prior workpieces, prior inspection information about prior laminatesformed from the prior workpieces, and prior user input identifying priorlaminate nonconformances in the prior laminates.
 10. The nonconformancemanagement system of claim 1, wherein the analyzer predicts anoccurrence of the laminate nonconformance before the layup of layers arecured to form the laminate using the layup information.
 11. Thenonconformance management system of claim 1, wherein the analyzeridentifies a set of parts that can be formed from the laminate using thenonconformance information about the laminate nonconformance.
 12. Thenonconformance management system of claim 1, wherein the nonconformanceinformation describing the laminate nonconformance comprises at leastone of a location, a region containing the laminate nonconformance, anonconformance type, a laminate status, a laminate part number, orlaminate constituent parts.
 13. The nonconformance management system ofclaim 1 further comprising: an identifier associated with the workpiece,wherein the identifier identifies the laminate formed from theworkpiece.
 14. The nonconformance management system of claim 13, whereinthe identifier is selected from one of a barcode, a radio frequencyidentifier, text, a visual code, and a machine-readable identifier. 15.The nonconformance management system of claim 3, wherein the inputsystem is selected from at least one of a mouse, a keyboard, a gesturedetection device, a camera, a virtual reality glove, a microphone, agaze tracker, or a motion detector.
 16. The nonconformance managementsystem of claim 1, wherein the display system is selected from at leastone of a projector, a laser projector, smart glasses, a smart contactlens, a tablet computer, a mobile phone, or a mobile computing devicehaving a camera and a display device.
 17. The nonconformance managementsystem of claim 1, wherein the workpiece platform is the inspectionplatform.
 18. The nonconformance management system of claim 1, whereinthe layup of layers comprises a first outer layer, a core layer, and asecond outer layer, wherein the core layer is located between the firstouter layer and the second outer layer.
 19. The nonconformancemanagement system of claim 18, wherein the first outer layer is selectedfrom one of a thermoplastic layer and a polyvinyl fluoride layer; thesecond outer layer is selected from one of the thermoplastic layer andthe polyvinyl fluoride layer; and wherein the core layer is selectedfrom one of a resin layer, a carbon layer, and a honeycomb layer. 20.The nonconformance management system of claim 18, wherein the layup oflayers further comprises at least one of a release sheet, a textureblanket, or a coating layer.
 21. A nonconformance management systemcomprising: a sensor system that records layup information about a layupof layers that form a workpiece; and an analyzer in a computer systemthat predicts a laminate nonconformance in a laminate using the layupinformation, wherein the laminate is formed from curing the layup oflayers, generates change information indicating a change in the layup oflayers that reduces a probability that the laminate nonconformance willbe present when the layup of layers is cured to form the laminate, anddisplays the change information indicating the change in the layup oflayers on a live view of the layup of layers using a display system foran augmented reality display.
 22. The nonconformance management systemof claim 21, wherein the analyzer identifies a layup nonconformance inthe layup of layers and the change information includes instructions toresolve the layup nonconformance in the layup of layers such that theprobability that the laminate nonconformance will be present when thelayup of layers is cured to form the laminate is reduced.
 23. Thenonconformance management system of claim 21, wherein the analyzeranalyzes inspection information to determine whether the laminatenonconformance is present in the laminate and displays nonconformanceinformation about the laminate nonconformance on the live view of thelaminate for the augmented reality display when the laminatenonconformance is present in the laminate.
 24. The nonconformancemanagement system of claim 21, wherein the change information includesat least one of a layup nonconformance type for a layup nonconformance,a location in the layup of layers containing the layup nonconformance,or an instruction to resolve the layup nonconformance.
 25. Thenonconformance management system of claim 21, wherein the layup oflayers comprises a first outer layer, a core layer, and a second outerlayer, wherein the core layer is located between the first outer layerand the second outer layer.
 26. The nonconformance management system ofclaim 25, wherein the first outer layer is selected from one of athermoplastic layer and a polyvinyl fluoride layer; the second outerlayer is selected from one of the thermoplastic layer and the polyvinylfluoride layer; and wherein the core layer is selected from one of aresin layer, a carbon layer, and a honeycomb layer.
 27. Thenonconformance management system of claim 25, wherein the layup oflayers further comprises at least one of a release sheet, a textureblanket, or a coating layer.
 28. A nonconformance management systemcomprising: a sensor system that detects a laminate on an inspectionplatform, wherein the laminate is formed from curing a workpiececomprising a layup of layers; and an analyzer in a computer system thatdetermines whether a laminate nonconformance is present in the laminateusing layup information recorded by the sensor system, generatesnonconformance information about the laminate nonconformance when thelaminate nonconformance is detected, and displays the nonconformanceinformation about the laminate nonconformance on the laminate using adisplay system for an augmented reality display, wherein the analyzerdetermines whether the laminate nonconformance is present in thelaminate using an artificial intelligence system trained using priorlayup information recorded for prior workpieces, prior inspectioninformation about prior laminates formed from the prior workpieces, andprior user input about prior nonconformances in the prior laminates. 29.The nonconformance management system of claim 28 further comprising: aninput system that receives a user input, wherein the analyzer requeststhe user input to verify whether an identification of the laminatenonconformance in the laminate identified by the analyzer has aconfidence level that is less than a threshold for proceeding withoutthe user input.
 30. The nonconformance management system of claim 28,further comprising: an input system that receives a user input, andwherein the analyzer requests the user input to verify whether anidentification of the laminate nonconformance in the laminate identifiedby the analyzer is correct when the identification of the laminatenonconformance in the laminate identified by the analyzer has aconfidence level that is less that a threshold for proceeding withoutthe user input.
 31. The nonconformance management system of claim 30further comprising: a trainer in the computer system that trains theartificial intelligence system using the user input.
 32. Thenonconformance management system of claim 28 further comprising: aninput system that receives a user input, and wherein the analyzerrequests the user input to verify whether an identification of thelaminate nonconformance in the laminate identified by the analyzer iscorrect as based on a setting that indicates that an operator is to beprompted for a verification.
 33. The nonconformance management system ofclaim 32 further comprising: a trainer in the computer system thattrains the artificial intelligence system using the user input.
 34. Thenonconformance management system of claim 28, wherein the analyzeridentifies a set of parts that can be formed from the laminate usingnonconformance information about the laminate nonconformance.
 35. Amethod for managing manufacturing of a laminate, the method comprising:recording, by a sensor system, layup information about a layup of layerson a workpiece platform, wherein the layup of layers forms a workpiece;recording, by the sensor system, inspection information about thelaminate on an inspection platform, wherein the laminate is formed fromcuring the workpiece; receiving, by a user input system, a user inputdescribing a laminate nonconformance in the laminate on the inspectionplatform; and training, by a computer system, an artificial intelligencesystem using the layup information, the inspection information, and theuser input describing the laminate nonconformance.
 36. The method ofclaim 35 further comprising: predicting the laminate nonconformance inthe laminate using the layup information, wherein the laminate is formedfrom curing the layup of layers; generating change informationindicating a change in the layup of layers that reduces a probabilitythat the laminate nonconformance will be present when the layup oflayers is cured to form the laminate, and displaying the changeinformation indicating the change in the layup of layers on a live viewof the layup of layers using a display system for an augmented realitydisplay.
 37. The method of claim 36 further comprising: receivinganother user input verifying whether the laminate nonconformancepredicted for the laminate is present in the laminate.
 38. The method ofclaim 35 further comprising: identifying a set of parts and a part typethat can be formed from the laminate using an identifier andnonconformance information about the laminate nonconformance.
 39. Themethod of claim 35 further comprising: determining a status of thelaminate based on a set of patterns for a set of parts.
 40. The methodof claim 35, wherein the user input describing the laminatenonconformance comprises at least one of a location of the laminatenonconformance, a region containing the laminate nonconformance, anonconformance type, or a laminate status.
 41. The method of claim 35,wherein the layup of layers comprises a first outer layer, a core layer,and a second outer layer, wherein the core layer is located between thefirst outer layer and the second outer layer.
 42. The method of claim41, wherein the layup of layers further comprises at least one of arelease sheet, a texture blanket, or a coating layer.